I've heard from several people, and one of the most interesting discussions have been with Meg Vivers, Australian historian, author and artist. This is one of those times when one feels an instant kinship with another person. I am hoping to meet Meg in person - perhaps even in Havana......
Examples of Meg's paintings can be found on her website:
Meg writes:
The
paintings I have done of our outback country and desert seem to need
lots of what perhaps could be termed negative space. In fact the space
is what evokes the huge sense of distance and timelessness out in that
country.
Evelyn: Exactly.....the question could
be "does the line that separates one part of the negative space from
the other have "life."' Does it require a smooth, continuous line or
would a broken line, a line with some irregularity add to the image?
Perhaps not - but a good question.
Meg: Does your Raphael portrait have that effect? I wonder.
Evelyn:
I see the line that defines the hat, collar and shoulder as being very
much "alive". And on the other side of that line, the negative shape is
strong.
Try this exercise: draw the shape of the background just using the line. Then draw the line that defines the hat, collar and shoulder with no suggestion of interior shape or subject.
Turn your paper on its side. Does the line suggest "life", movement, interest - or is it static?
Try this exercise: draw the shape of the background just using the line. Then draw the line that defines the hat, collar and shoulder with no suggestion of interior shape or subject.
Turn your paper on its side. Does the line suggest "life", movement, interest - or is it static?
Meg:
This portraIt is, one would suggest, a very static painting (timeless?)
Does negative space when it dominates or competes with positive space
present something timeless?
Meg:
Is there tension in my outback paintings? Or is there a mysterious
sense of deja vu as the seasons repeat. More importantly, does the
negative space become the most important aspect?
Evelyn: I find the sense of mystery to be most powerful in your work. The sense of space is especially vivid.
Meg:
I obviously feel the need for strong lines, especially in my stronger
paintings, to bring them to life. Never thought about them being a
separation, rather than a way of defining shapes.
Evelyn: It's more that the line creates a shape on EACH side, rather than thinking of it (the line) as a separation
Evelyn: It's more that the line creates a shape on EACH side, rather than thinking of it (the line) as a separation
Meg:
On the other hand, I now feel more and more the need to enter the
negative space with softer lines and shapes, which introduce extra
layers and evoke movement throughout the painting.
|
Rain On Fire
Are
these paintings more representative of my immediate surroundings on
the Eastern tablelands - bush, rocks, trees, etc.? Perhaps.
Mist Not Rain
Evelyn: I see layers of color, interesting negative shapes within the larger shape.. and great lines.
I
am convinced that the value of studying ideas like those espoused by
Bennett Gale is in provoking conversations like the one we are having
here.I think the value is in the questions and then how the artist
responds to them.
Meg:
For some reason, recently my hand can't help moving into the spaces, using lines that later become vaguely familiar shapes.
Of
course, once you start this, the sky has to move as well! Not only
does the sky have to become more fluid, the trees must penetrate the
horizon and break into the sky.
Am
I eliminating neg space because I have not been out into the centre of
Australia for some time, and I have forgotten the space
which
impacts on you, especially at night?? Out there in the desert, the
space is the reality. You have to look closely for the detail! It is
there, but you do not notice it at first.
Another artists' thoughts on the next posting; join in the conversation!
Leave a comment or send me a note at artist@evelyndunphy.com with your thoughts.Happy Painting!
Evelyn
No comments:
Post a Comment